Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Bauer's avatar

I agree with Elizabeth's comment. You are masterful at using stories from your clinical activity to reveal the inner mind and soul of Family Practice. I do like the "word salad," and it aligns well with a new book by Alan Roth DO and Andy Lazirs MD A Return to Healing. They use the terms Oslerian vs Flexnerian medicine to describe the difference in approach to caring for people

Expand full comment
Doug Bates's avatar

As for your "Zen and the Art of Doctoring" - a meditation on Robert Pirsig's thoughts applied to the practice of medicine, I write occasionally about Pirsig's philosophy at "Atarxia or Bust." And, although I'm not a doctor, I'm married to one, and I serve as the uncredited editor of her Substack, "Doctoring Unpacked." So, I think I have a bit of insight into your subject.

I think what's here is AI BS.

Pirsig's idea of Quality isn't a distinction between the "mechanical aspects of any practice" and the "human element that gives the work its meaning." While the technical aspects of medical practice are in the domain of Classic Quality, Classic Quality extends to the patient interaction. It is closely involved in what gives medical work its meaning. Remember, Phaedrus' Romantic-preferring motorcyclist friends eschewed motorcycle maintenance. They were just there for the ride. The Romantic Quality of seeing a typical shaman is probably greater than that of seeing a typical internist, but the internist has the advantage that most of what they're doing has efficacy beyond the placebo effect and entertaining the patient while nature heals them. 

No one needs AI to decree that "the true art of doctoring, therefore, lies in integrating the scientific with the philosophical." The very first doctors who attempted to be scientific were well aware that what they were doing was integrated with philosophy. Galen wrote a book on this topic. The Greek schools of medicine were joined at the hip with the Greek schools of philosophy. That the Pyrrhonist philosopher Sextus Empiricus had an agnomen indicating he was an Empiric physician was no coincidence. 

Pirsig’s idea here of “the knife that cuts too fine” is pure AI hallucinated BS. Pirsig never said any such thing. Google it and you'll find your article is the only mention.

Moreover, medicine as a practice is not a science and never has been. It's a techne, just like motorcycle maintenance is. This is not to say that it doesn't occasionally employ the scientific method. Pirsig himself elaborates on the scientific method using motorcycle maintenance as an example. 

There's a "quiet space between diagnosis and cure" that contains a "fleeting but profound glimpse of Quality." Pure deepity hogwash, lacking in any meaning.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts